Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Author: iygd

August undefined, 2024

WebNov 23, 2024 · Specifically the 24-70mm ($600 more for RF), and the 70-200mm ($800 more). If you have existing EF lenses, I would run with those for now. I have three EF … WebMost Canon EF lenses should work fine or better on the R6. Some exceptions do exist, impacting AF coverage and / or fps. With 3rd party lenses there is a higher risk of the same issues occurring, especially with older ones that can't be updated - some of them use lens ids that Canon used for lenses that don' t perform well on the R series.

What Is The Difference Between Canon RF and EF …

WebThese include a 24-105 f4 L, 35 f2, 50 f1.8 and 18-135 USM. I love using the 80D/35 f2 as a walk around setup. If I trade in all my crop sensor kit to mpb.com, I should receive … WebHelp me decide: Fujifilm X-T5 vs Canon EOS R8. after neglecting my beloved hobby in the last few years/unpacking my cameras far too seldom, the fascination grabbed me again. After some market research, I came across camera models that caught my attention: the Fujifilm X-T5 and the EOS R8. I know that these are two very different cameras, and to ... flowers associated with february

EF 70-200mm f/4 vs RF 70-200mm f/4 : r/canon - reddit

WebNo loss in image quality or autofocus performance, at all, when using a basic EF-to-EF-M or EF-to-RF adapter. All a basic adapter does is push the lens out to be the correct distance from the sensor in order to properly focus the light, and extend the electrical contacts out so that the body can communicate with the lens. WebJan 11, 2016 · The RF 70-200/2.8 is my favourite major-change lens. To me, the size and weight difference over the EF is very real, and well-worth the telescoping action. Probably the RF70-200/4 is a huge improvement in usability too, but I've never shot with it. I like it even better than the RF100-500 vs the EF100-400. ••• WebEF lenses are designed for Canon's DSLR cameras, while RF lenses are specifically created for Canon's mirrorless cameras. RF lenses have a larger mount diameter, which allows them to transmit more information between the lens and camera body. This means that RF lenses can offer faster autofocus and better image stabilization. flowers associated with each month

EF-S vs EF lenses : canon - reddit.com

WebOptically, the RF50/1.2 and RF85/1.2 L's are worlds better than the EF variants. They are much faster in AF speed and their sharpness when shot wide-open is unreal. Whether that's worth it to you or not, that's up to you to decide, but for someone that values these aspects, it is very much worth it. 19 MintyMarlfox • 3 yr. ago WebReddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Go to canon r/canon • by Appropriate-Year-505. EF 70-200mm F/4 non IS vs EFs 55-250mm IS STM . How significant is the difference? A used 70-200 will be around 500€, the 55-250 can be had for as low as 200€. Are the differences really worth the 300 ... flowers associated with christWebRF lenses have to be placed much closer to the sensor than EF, so if you have a mirrorless RF body you can adapt EF lenses to it, but there's no way to do this in reverse (you'd have to somehow jam the lenses almost an extra inch into your camera.) 3 kickstand • 21 days ago EF or EF-S lenses only. Not RF, not EF-M, not the old Canon FD. 2 green and white prada sneakers

"WebNov 23, 2024 · For this purpose these lenses have been compared: Canon RF 50mm 1.2L. Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L. Canon EF 50mm 1.2L. … " - Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon RF vs EF lenses? Worth extra $? Canon Forums

WebRF vs EF 24-70 2.8. I just ordered the R6. And now am looking into a buying a 24-70 2.8. I’m in debate with myself about the following choice. The RF 24-70 or the EF 24-70 ii. The second one is regularly available as second hand and gives room for another second hand lens. But the built quality of je RF is way better. WebThe RF 24-105 f4 is larger and heavier, but optically superior, aside from the constant f4 maximum aperture. It is weather sealed and has both a control and focus ring. The RF 24-105 f4-7.1 is small and light and forms a very small fullframe package combined with the RP. The tradeoffs of the f4-7.1 are:

Did you know?

WebThe RP body would run me $899 on canon site refurbished or roughly $600 used on craigslist, etc. Lenses I'm considering for M50 as well as RP if I go that route.... RF. Rokinon 14mm f2.8 $250 NEW (B&H) Canon 50mm f1.8 $200 NEW (Canon) Canon 35mm f1.8 $400 REFURB (Canon) Canon 24-105mm f4 $880 REFURB (Canon) EF-M WebOld 'L' EF zoom lenses vs. new RF 'non-L' primes. I recently decided to get back into photography and bought a Canon RP body. It seemed like a great price point to test the waters with the hobby again; I also really liked the small form factor for a full frame sensor. I have two lenses from a past life: an EF 24-70m, 2.8 L and a EF 70-200mm 2.8L.

WebAll three have Image Stabilization, including the Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM and Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM, where the corresponding EF lenses do not. "And the third lens in the trinity, the Canon RF 70 … WebHmm the specs on the 80d are decent other than crop sensor. I think the RP is a good step up - but only if it’s cos you don’t want to spend a few extra $ on the R. If you want a rugged body the canon rp is perhaps not the way to go. I played with one at the canon gallery in Osaka Japan last week.

WebI currently own the EF 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS II, TS-E 24mm f/3.5L, TS-E 17mm f/4L, and RF 70-200mm f/4L. I'd say that they all seem to have fairly similar build quality and construction materials. I certainly haven't noticed any dramatic differences when out shooting. WebWhether the lens is EF or EF-S makes NO difference here. Focal length is focal length and field of view is determined by focal length and the physical size of the sensor. All an EF-S lens tells you is that the lens doesn't have reasonable quality outside the cropped sensor of …

WebIn the image quality comparison equalized at f/4, the two lenses are similar overall, with each having some advantages at specific focal lengths. The f/4 lens has stronger geometric distortion and has stronger lateral CA. The f/2.8 has stronger peripheral shading in most equalized comparisons.

WebIt is the spiritual successor of the EF-S 55-250MM F4-5.6 IS STM and the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM lenses. If you have tried either of those older lenses and liked them, you will probably like the RF 100-400mm. I own the EF-S 55-250mm, and it may be my favourite lens I have ever owned. flowers associated with hestiaWebReddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Mostly EF L lenses at the moment using the adapter. 24-70mm 2.8L II 70-200mm 2.8L II 16-35mm 2.8L III 85mm 1.4L 50mm 1.4 ... [New … flowers associated with geminisWebCanon and Sony prices are comparable for similar quality but Sony does have far more lower-end lenses, plus third-party lenses. Both systems adapt EF lenses well (use the Sigma MC-11 for Sony). Canon has some unique RF lenses that might push you to them. The 70-200 f2.8 is VERY compact. green and white projectorWebWelcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. We also sometime talk about other canon equipment such as printers. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome! flowers associated with irelandWebThe EF lenses will adapt onto the R-series bodies and work the same as—if not better than—on DSLR bodies, so there's definitely nothing wrong with buying a EF version and adapting it, especially considering the price difference between EF and RF. flowers associated with hellWebJun 6, 2024 · The Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens - an optical masterpiece. Neat 6 minutes video by BorrowLenses telling differences between Canon’s RF mount for mirrorless cameras and EF mount for … green and white print dressWebThe RP has the same sensor as the 6Dii, which according to DxOMark scores, has about 1.5 stops less DR than the SL2 at ISO 100. That difference decreases to both performing pretty much equally at ISO 400, and at higher ISOs the 6Dii sensor offers an extra stop of DR. So I think the notion that the SL2 "blows the EOS RP out of the water" is a ... green and white prom dresses